×
Please fill all required fields
Receiving your marked assignment back can be a moment of anxiety for any student. But that document, covered in your marker's comments, is the single most valuable tool you have for raising your grade from a 2:2 to a 2:1, or a 2:1 to a First.
The problem? Most students don't know how to use it.
Academic feedback is a specialised language. Tutors use it to provide a roadmap, but students often only see a critique. This guide will teach you how to decode that language, turn it into an actionable plan, and effectively redraft your work to secure a higher mark.
Before you can act, you must understand. Markers often use shorthand phrases to diagnose common (and major) issues in academic work.
Your feedback isn't personal; it's a technical assessment. Top university guides (like those from Sheffield and Bath) consistently show that students struggle most with vague terms. Here’s what they really mean:
Don't be overwhelmed by a sea of red ink. Organise the comments into three simple categories to identify the most urgent problem:
By categorising, you'll see if you have one big problem (e.g., all Content) or several small ones.
As guides from Imperial College and Newcastle University advise, it's vital to separate your work from your worth. A 58% is not a comment on your intelligence; it's a technical score for a piece of work that didn't meet specific criteria.
It's tempting to shove a disappointing mark in a drawer. Do not do this.
Give yourself 24 hours to feel annoyed or disappointed. Then, sit down with a coffee and this guide, and prepare to look at the feedback objectively as a set of instructions for your next assignment.
Our service goes beyond basic writing. We specialise in specific referencing styles (Harvard, APA, OSCOLA) and subject complexities, ensuring your work meets the high expectations of your module leader.
Understanding is half the battle. Application is where you win the war. This section provides the actionable steps to turn critique into a concrete plan.
Look back at your last three assignments, even from different modules. Do you see the same comments appearing?
This is your feedback "pattern." This recurring mistake is the single biggest thing holding your grade back. Your tutors are trying to tell you what it is. If you can fix this one pattern, you can unlock a higher grade boundary across all your modules.
Top academic skills centres (like those at Leeds and Sheffield) provide "feedback logs" for a reason: they work. Turn your vague feedback into specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals.
Don't just write "be more critical." Create an action plan.
| Marker's Comment | What it Really Means | My SMART Action for Next Time |
|---|---|---|
| "Needs more criticality" | I'm describing theories, not evaluating them. | (S) For my next essay, (M) every body paragraph will include at least one sentence that compares or contrasts two different authors. (A) I will use the "critical questions" checklist from my university library. (R) This will move my writing from descriptive to analytical. (T) I will do this in my first draft, due next week. |
| "Weak structure" | My points are in a random order. | (S) I will write my introduction last. (M) I will first write all my body paragraphs on separate cards and physically arrange them on my desk until the flow is logical. (A) This is an easy structural fix. (R) This will ensure my argument builds logically from one point to the next. (T) I will do this at the outlining stage. |
Once you have your action plan, how do you apply it to a redraft (or a future assignment)?
You are not in this alone. Feedback is the start of a conversation, not the end of one.
Tutors want to help you improve. But there is a right and a wrong way to approach them.
This approach is professional, respectful, and "feeds forward," showing you are focused on improvement, not arguing.
If your tutor or module offers the chance to submit a draft, outline, or 500-word sample, always take it. This is "forward feedback" (or "formative feedback"), and it is the single best way to prevent a disappointing final mark. It allows you to get guidance before the final push, when you still have time to make major changes.
The marker's feedback is written against a set of criteria. That criteria is almost always available to you from day one in your module handbook, known as the marking rubric.
Before you submit any assignment, read the rubric for a First-class mark. Does your work honestly meet that criteria? Then read the criteria for a 2:2. Does your work contain any of those faults? Be your own first marker. This self-assessment check will catch 80% of potential problems before your tutor ever sees them.
This is the commercial transition, linking the high-value informational content to the targeted service.
You've read this guide. You understand what "needs more criticality" means. You've even created an action plan.
Now what?
This is the gap where most students stay stuck. Understanding the problem is one thing. Flawlessly executing the complex structural, critical, and linguistic changes required to fix it is another.
It's incredibly difficult to be objective about your own work. You may think you're being more critical, but you're too close to the text to see that you're still just describing. This is where an objective, expert third party becomes your most powerful tool.
This is where we come in. Our professional academic help service is designed for students who have their tutor's feedback and need expert help applying it.
This isn't an "essay writing" mill. This is a high-level implementation service.
You provide us with your original draft (or a new draft) and the tutor's feedback. Our UK-based, subject-specialist editors will:
We take the guesswork out of improvement and ensure your redraft or next assignment perfectly executes the required changes to maximise your mark.
Don't let valuable feedback go to waste. Stop struggling to interpret and start improving.
Because feedback is freshest in your mind right after submission, reviewing it promptly helps you connect the comments with the specific choices you made while writing. Waiting too long can make it harder to remember your reasoning or spot patterns across assignments.
Don’t guess. Highlight confusing comments and bring them to your tutor or academic advisor. You can email them politely or discuss them in office hours. Tutors appreciate students who seek clarification because it shows genuine engagement.
Yes, especially across modules or disciplines. Each tutor values different aspects (e.g., theory depth vs. clarity). If this happens, prioritise the expectations of the specific module marker and ask for clarification on what they consider “strong work.”
Peer feedback can be incredibly useful for clarity, flow, and argument strength. While peers can’t assess you like a tutor, they represent your target reader—someone intelligent but not inside your head. If they can’t follow your logic, your structure likely needs improvement.
Ideally, within a week—while the feedback and assignment are still fresh. The earlier you apply lessons from one assignment to the next, the stronger your academic writing will become across the term.
Grades don’t always show progress in skill. Ask for qualitative feedback on your analytical depth, originality, and argument sophistication. Even strong students plateau—pushing beyond that requires targeted improvement, not just grade maintenance.